Yeah, but it's like one chapter ends once an AS game is played. You have to treat these people based on the "new" chapter, not the old. It just doesn't make sense to me. It was also 2 years ago or so. Things change.
And yeah, I think that go def helped Zach. thats true. But then again, if Zach was anti trio, idk if go would have protected him.
Also I find AS1 to be relevant because he didn't care then because of his character. Imo a series is a series and you shouldn't care more just because of who you're playing as.
I can kinda vouch for this part because I am the same way, if I'm not someone who I like or someone who is like me, then that's less of a chance that I will be invested in the game. I know it's a silly reason but playing as someone who I like is also a reason for me to try to do well too.
Post by David Lane on Sept 8, 2015 22:20:51 GMT -5
Zach for sure benefited the most from the situation. But I also think had the trio been discovered sooner or not been a factor here, he still would have done very well.
Imo Zach was the best player here. Idc about trio or dixie or his whining at times, he had his game in his own hands, made the biggest impact, and had full control over all of his lap dogs.
If we're discussing how the trio protected Zach, then might as well mention how it went after his closest allies. Memphis being the biggest loss for Zach ally-wise. I think that made it harder. With all the ifs and what ifs here i don't rly factor it in though.
Meh Memphis crying over the way Zach 'betrayed' him. I get they would handle it differently, but I don't know if Zach really would have chosen Nick over Memphis if they were the final 3?
I get Zach's frustration with Nick's vids lol, it's totally strategy xD Not sure about the way Zach is handling it though. Personally i would refuse to watch >3min vids as a juror.
After the game he will realize that Zach did value him. Or maybe when he posts a statement/question, Zach can explain. I kinda feel like Zach would have chosen Nick? only bc they worked together better gamewise but who knows what he would have done. It's hard having two final 2s lol
After seeing Nick's video answers and stuff, I can understand it coming across as rambling for sure. I understand him not wanting to sound like he's trying to discredit everything Zach did, but it sort of gave the tone of him saying how Zach played well for almost the first 3 minutes. Also, I get what his intention is with answers and stuff, I just don't know if it's quite working out like he'd hoped at the moment.
Yeah, but it was in his jury list thread which is why I said it's possible he meant it that way, but I agree. It looked like a final vote to me too. Either way, I don't mind. I'm ok with you locking it if u want to. His question is dumb anyway.